1.Abanikannda, O.T.F., Olutogun, O., Leigh, A.O. and Ajayi, L.A., 2007. Statistical modeling of egg weight and egg dimensions in commercial layers. Int. J. Poult Sci., 6(1): 59-63.

2.Abrahamsson, P. and R. Tauson., 1995. Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and birds’ location in three hybrids. Acta Agric. Scand., 45: 191–200

3.Abrahamsson, P., Tauson, R. and Elwinger, K. 1996. Effects on production, health and egg quality of varying proportions of wheat and barley in diets for two hybrids of laying hens kept in different housing systems. Acta Agric. Scand., 46(3): 173- 182.

4.Adam, I.Y.I., 2017. Effect of Deep-Litter Floor and Battery Cages System on the Productive Performance of Commercial Layers in Elobied, Sudan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kordofan).

5.Ahammed, M., Chae, B.J., Lohakare, J., Keohavong, B., Lee, M.H., Lee, S.J., Kim, D.M., Lee, J.Y. and Ohh, S.J., 2014. Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci., 27(8): 1190-1196.

6.Anderson, K.E. and Adams, A.W., 1992. Effects of rearing density and feeder and waterer spaces on the productivity and fearful behaviour of layers. Poult. Sci., 71(1): 53-58.

7.Anderson, K.E. and Adams, A.W., 1994. Effects of floor versus cage rearing and feeder space on growth, long bone development, and duration of tonic immobility in single comb White Leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci., 73(7): 958-964.

8.Anonymous. 1997. Hubbard Breeder Management Guide. Hubbard Farms, Walpole, New: pp. 21-32.

9.Anonymous. 2009. Cobb Breeder Management Guide. Cobb Farms, Arkansas, USA: pp. 14-22

10.AOAC, 2003. Official methods of analysis of the association of official’s analytical chemists,17th edn. Association of official analytical chemists, Arlington, Virginia.

11.Armstrong, D.V. and Quick, A.J., 1986. Time and motion to measure milking parlor performance. J. of Dairy Sci, 69(4): 1169-1177.

12.Aryal, S., 2018. MacConkey Agar-composition, principle, uses, preparation and colony morphology. Obtenido de Microbiologyinfo: Accesed on http://www. Microbiologyinfo. com/macconkey-agar-composition-principle-uses- preparation-and-colony-morphology.

13.Basic Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Statistics. 2019, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

14.Bell, D.D., Weaver, W.D. and North, M.O. 2002. Commercial chicken meat and egg production. 4th Ed Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 25-850.

15.Bell, D.D., Weaver, W.D. and North, M.O. 2007. Commercial chicken meat and egg production. 5th Ed Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 140-780

16.Burdine, W.B., Bagley, C.P. and Evans, R.R., 1993. Weanling heifer performance on chicken litter supplements. Livestock Day Rep. MAFES Bull., 243: 24.

17.Castellini, C., Perella, F., Mugnai, C. and Dal Bosco, A., 2006. Welfare, productivity and qualitative traits of egg in laying reared under different rearing systems. In Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. on Poultry, Sept, 2006..Verona, Italy, pp. 592-598

18.Clark, C.E.F., Farina, S.R., Garcia, S.C., Islam, M.R., Kerrisk, K.L. and Fulkerson, W.J. 2016. A comparison of conventional and automatic milking system pasture utilization and pre and post grazing pasture mass. Grass and Forage Sci., 71(1): 153-159.

19.Cole, T.J., Kreger, L.L. and Bird, C.R., CTB Inc, 2009. Pan breeder feeder. U.S. Patent 7,584,716.

20.Devendra, C. and Raghavan, G.V. (1978). Agricultural by- products in South East Asia: Availability, Utilisation and potential value. World. Rev. Anim. Prod., 14: 11-28.

21.Du Plessis, P.H.C. and Erasmus, J., 1972. The relationship between egg production, egg weight and body weight in laying hens. World. Poult. Sci. J., 28(3): 301-310.

22.Ðuki?-Stoj?i?, M., Peri?, L., Bjedov, S. and Miloševi?, N., 2009. The quality of table eggs produced in different housing systems. Biotech. Anim. Husbandry., 25(5/6): 1103-1108.

23.Eekeren, N.V., Maas, A., Saatkamp, H.W. and Verschuur, M., 2006. Small-scale chicken production. 4th Ed, Agromisa/ CTA, Wageningen,. pp.1-91

24.Englmaierová, M., T?mová, E., Charvátová, V. and Sk?ivan, M. 2014. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59: 345-352.

25.Ensimnger, M.E., 1977. Anim. Sci. (7th ed). The Interstate printers and publishers, USA. pp. 860-871.

26.Gerzilov, V., Datkova, V., Mihaylova, S. and Bozakova, N. 2012. Effect of poultry housing systems on egg production. Bulgarian J. Agri. Sci., 18(6): 953-957.

27.Goan, C. 1994. Management of nipple watering systems for broilers. Agricultural Extension Service, University of Tennessee. Accessed on http://www.utextension.utk.edu/ publications/pbfiles/pb1, 533.

28.Harms, R.H. 1984. The influence of feeding program on peak production and avoiding sudden declines in production with broiler breeders. Poult. Sci., 63(8): 1667-1668.

29.Haug, A., Williams, R.B. and Larsen, S. 2006. Counting coccidial oocysts in chicken faeces: a comparative study of a standard McMaster technique and a new rapid method. Vet. Parasitol., 136(3-4): 233-242.

30.Hovi, M., Sundrum, A. and Thamsborg, S.M. 2003. Animal health and welfare in organic livestock production in Europe: current state and future challenges. Livestock Prod. Sci., 80(1-2): 41-53.

31.Hurnik, G.I., Reinhart, B.S. and Hurnik, J.F. 1978. Relationship between albumen quality and hatchability in fresh and stored hatching eggs. Poult. Sci., 57(4): 854-857.

32.Idowu, P.A., Mpayipheli, M. and Muchenje, V. 2018. Practices, housing and diseases within indigenous poultry production in Eastern Cape, South Africa. J. Agric. Sci., 10: 111-121.

33.Jahan, S., Islam, F., Bhuiyan, M.S.A. and Bhuiyan, A.K.F.H., 2017. Productive and reproductive performances of indigenous chicken in the rural condition of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 46(2): 121-127.

34.Kekeocha, C.C. 1984. Pfizer poultry production handouts. Published by Pfizer Corporation, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 165- 166.

35.Kristensen, I.S. and Sillebak-Kristensen, I. 1996. Ecological production of eggs and crops. Technical and economic farm results in 1994-95. Beretningfra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsog.,730: 93-163

36.Lacin E, Yildiza, Esenbugan and Macitm. 2008. The effects of differences in the initial body weight of groups on laying performance and egg quality parameters of Lohmann laying hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 53(11): 466-471.

37.Lamidi, O.S. 1995. Poultry Manure as Supplement for Cattle Grazing the Natural Pastures. M Sc Thesis, Department of Animal Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

38.Lampkin, N., Padel, S., Fowler, S., Rajah, K., Mcdougall, I., Langstaff, L., O’regan, T. and Sharples, T. 1997. Organic Poultry Production; Report to MAFF; Welsh Institute of Rural Studies,University of Wales: Aberystwyth, UK.

39.Leeson, S. and Summers, J., 1991. Commercial Poultry Nutrition. 3rd Ed. Nottingham University Press, Guelph. Ontario., pp. 190-332.

40.Leeson, S. and Summers, J., 2009. Commercial Poultry Nutrition 4th Ed. Nottingham University Press, Guelph. Ontario., pp. 284-375.

41.Macari, M. and Amaral, L.A. 1997. Importancia da Qualidade da Agua Na Criacao de Frangos de Corte: Tipos, Vantagens e Desvantagens. Anais da Apinco Campinas., pp. 121-143.

42.Meunier, Salaün, M.C., Huon, F. and Faure, J.M. 1984. Lack of influence of pullet rearing conditions on the hen’s performance. Br. Poult. Sci., 25(4): 541-546.

43.Mugnai, C., Dal Bosco, A. and Castellini, C. 2009. Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens. Italian J. Anim. Sci., 8(2): 175-188.

44.Neijat, M., House, J.D., Guenter, W. and Kebreab, E. 2011. Production performance and nitrogen flow of Shaver White layers housed in enriched or conventional cage systems. Poult. Sci., 90(3): 543-554.

45.Petek, M. 1999. Production traits and economic efficiencies of different genotypes of layers reared by enterprises in Bursa province and it’s near vicinity. Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi Uludag Universitesi., 18(1-2): 65-77.

46.Platz, S., Heyn, E., Hergt, F., Weigl, B. and Erhard, M., 2009.3rd Ed. Comparative study on the behavior, health and productivity of laying hens in a furnished cage and an aviary system. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr., 122(7-8): 235- 240.

47.Qureshi, M.A., Hussain, I. and Heggen, C.L., 1998. Understanding immunology in disease development and control. Poult. Sci., 77(8): 1126-1129.

48.Rakonjac, S., Bogosavljevi?-Boškovi?, S., Škrbi?, Z., Peri?, L., Doskovi?, V., Petrovi?, M.D. and Petri?evi?, V. 2017. The effect of the rearing system, genotype and laying hens age on the egg weight and share of main parts of eggs. Acta Agric Scand A., 22(44): 185-192.

49.Rautenschlein, S., Yeh, H.Y. and Sharma, J.M., 2003. Comparative immunopathogenesis of mild, intermediate, and virulent strains of classic infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis., 47(1): 66-78.

50.Reyna, P.S., Mcdougald, L.R. and Mathis, G.F. 1983. Survival of coccidia in poultry litter and reservoirs of infection. Avian Dis., 464-473.

51.Ruffin, B.G. and Mccaskey, T.A. 1990. Feeding broiler litter to cattle. Circular ANR-Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, Auburn University (USA).

52.Saleh, H.M., Elwan, K.M., El-Fouly, H.A., Ibrahim, I.I., Salama, A.M. and Elashry, M.A. 2002. The use of poultry waste as a dietary supplement for ruminants field evaluation of animal feed supplementation packages, pp. 43.

53.Scanes, C.G. 2016. Biology of stress in poultry with emphasis on glucocorticoids and the heterophil to lymphocyte ratio. Poult. Sci., 95(9): 2208-2215.

54.Shah, S., Westerman, P.W. and Parsons, J. 2006. Poultry litter amendments. NC Cooperative Extension Service

55.Singh, R.V., Saxena, V.K. and Sharma, D., 2009. Technological developments in the poultry sub-sector; In technology options for sustainable livestock production in India.

56.Sonkamble, V.V., Srivastava, A.K., Pawar, M.M., Chauhan, H.D., Ankuya, K.J. and Jain, A.K., 2020. Effect of cage or deep litter housing on production performance of White Leghorn chickens. J. Anim. Res., 10(2): 263-268.

57.Sosnówka-Czajka, E., Herbut, E. and Skomorucha, I. 2010. Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci., 10: 349-60.

58.Statistics, B.B.A.H., 20th Livestock census (2019). DAHDF, Ministry of Agriculture, pp. 65-73.

59.Tactacan, G.B., Guenter, W., Lewis, N.J., Rodriguez-Lecompte, J.C. and House, J.D. 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult. Sci., 88(4): 698-707.

60.Tanaka, T. and Hurnik, J.F., 1992. Comparison of behaviour and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poult. Sci., 71(2): 235-243.

61.Tauson, R., Wahlström, A. and Abrahamsson, P. 1999. Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 8(2): 152- 159.

62.Thiele, H.H. and Pottgüter, R. 2008. Management recommendations for laying hens in deep litter, perchery and free range systems. Lohman Information, 43(1): 53.

63.Tyagi, P.K., Shrivastav, A.K., Tyagi, P.K., Mandal, A.B. and Elangovan, A.V. 2009. Near infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy to predict the metabolisable energy content in poultry feeds. Indian J. Poul. Sci., 44(1): 45-48.

64.Van Krey, H.P. and Weaver Jr, W.D. 1988. Effects of feeder space on body weight uniformity of broiler breeder pullets during an alternate day feeding program. Poult. Sci., 67(7): 996-1000.